Friedrich Hayek
A biography for Friedrich Hayekhasn’t been written yet.
“The Market Dynamics of Speculation: Hayekian Market Signals and the Rise of the Culture Industries”
“Hayek and Socialism”
“The economics of information, market socialism and Hayek's legacy”
“Reader's Digest version of The Road to Serfdom”
“The Road to Serfdom in Five Minutes (QuickTime movie)”
“Mises.org The Road to Serfdom in cartoons as illustrated by Look Magazine”
“Hayek Links The most extensive list of links on Hayek”
“Directory of links on Hayek at the Open Directory Project”
“Information and Economics: A critique of Hayek essay included in the book Towards a New Socialism (PDF document)”
“"Objections to These Unions : What Friedrich Hayek can teach us about gay marriage" by Jonathan Rauch in Reason magazine (June 2004)”
“"The Road from Serfdom", interview (May 1977) by Thomas W. Hazlett in Reason (1992)”
“Brief biography in The Concise Encyclopedia of Economics at the Library of Economics and Liberty”
“Official 1974 Nobel Prize page”
“Hayek's influence on Friesian philosophy”
“Brief biography at the Ludwig von Mises Institute”
“Hans-Hermann Hoppe”
“Milton Friedman”
“Nearly two decades ago, during dinner with the late Nobel laureate Friedrich Hayek, I asked him if he had the power to write one law that would get government out of our lives, what would that law be? Hayek replied he'd write a law that read: Whatever Congress does for one American it must do for all Americans. He elaborated: If Congress makes payments to one American for not raising pigs, every American not raising pigs should also receive payments. Obviously, were there to be such a law, there would be reduced capacity for privilege-granting by Congress and less influence-peddling.”
“The most interesting among the courageous dissenters of the 1980s were the classical liberals, disciples of F. A. Hayek, from whom they had learned about the crucial importance of economic freedom and about the often-ignored conceptual difference between liberalism and democracy.”
“It does tend to make Hayek a much more systematic thinker in this area than he was. I am not saying that Hayek thought of himself as a good economist but only a moderately good political scientist or philosopher, but that is the fact. […] To repeat what I said above, Hayek was only a moderately good political scientist or philosopher. (I should say that Hayek's view of my work was much the same: He thought I was a good economist but didn't like my political science.)”